Rewriting the Grand Design
Judgmental thought is unavoidable due to the ever expanding structure of the Internet, and how we accomplish what Eve set out to do may not even be possible anymore. Loss of faith in our own processes, inaccurate conclusions, poor results, or the use of tactics like the Historical Treatment I refer to may confound our ability with conflict.
We believe the way to overcome these barriers is to be better adapted to the new environment, rather than to be isolated from it. That is, we must find a way to cooperate and adjust to what is becoming more intelligent and powerful than we are, or we will be left behind.
Each life is an unstoppable force - a juggernaught that adapts and progresses to prove that it is necessary to creation - that without it, creation itself would be flawed, or incomplete. The Illustrator of 'The Little Prince' puts it well. Dana describes the problem of doing this kind of work and how to get it done for others. [v]
Even if you think you know what you want, wouldn't you be a little disturbed by the fact that someone else is actually making the change?
Our genetics get cleaned up for our partners - that is, we rewrite what we were given to begin with very faithfully, and the changes that we make in our lives are not passed on to our offspring. Today, through Epigenesis, we hope to be able to preserve the lessons we are learning for our children and pass them on genetically - if not vicariously through the world wide web.
We believe these changes will be permanent and affect humanity for the duration. Our various fundamental scriptures all over the world are suffering scrutiny. Everything is being checked, double-checked, and rechecked. Please see: (Fundamentals, and Fundamentalism for a comparison.
Lacon uses a dialectic that allows one to speak for themselves, to develop a language specific to ones own perception and understanding of reality, and insists that our very existence depends upon the constancy of an unambiguous identity. Please see: Jacque Lacon: That one word... [iii]
We really need to have faith in this process in order for it to work. Creation has already built into its design natural selections and preferences that work. For us to assume we know best might preclude the wishes or intentions of our ideal partner for example, suggesting that perhaps we don't know what's best. Given any particular term or concept one might try to articulate, there are perhaps 20 - 25 meanings.[iii] It is not possible to anticipate every interpretation.
For a transposition of the original design to remain intact, it must contain the original within itself. As in music, it is only a key shift that results in different notes relative to the original score. The first note, and all resulting notes are shifted up or down, but still positioned with the same meter and relative distance from each other, so the change is only heard relative to the original. If we modify the original score, we might return to the principles of composition, but we cannot deny that the music is already being played, and unless what we compose is truly a harmonic addition to what already exists uniquely our own, we are not likely to be satisfied. Please see Žižek: [iv]~A meaningful and purposeful instance of creation that manifests through all our travails and difficulties - not an imitation, but a unique instance of 'God, that truly is evolving in creation - me, as I am', as well as who I choose to become.
It's clear that we don't always know what is best for us, or what we want, and that in an effort to get what we think we want, we may be very destructive. To condemn the violence that results is to ignore the fact that we may be causing it.